The first Pan-Australian FP&A Board was held digitally as a response to the pandemic outbreak. This digital meeting was devoted to 6 facets of the New Normal FP&A including Scenario Planning, Cash Flow Planning, FP&A Team Building, Technology, Driver Based & Predictive Planning and FP&A Skills and Roles.

The current world is full of dead budgets and unrealistic forecasts, and FP&A teams need to adapt quickly to prepare for the future. At the first Digital Pan-Asian FP&A Board, senior finance practitioners from large organisations shared their insights on a variety of topics.

How can you successfully implement a Zero-Based FP&A design? There are 10 practical steps to be taken into consideration.

Zero-Based Budgeting (ZBB) has been around for a while but not all organisations use it. In this article, I present a high-level overview of ZBB implementation and give some considerations.

A budget expresses thoughts with numbers. Numbers can be financial like income and cash flow or non-financial like time and volume. Expressing thoughts with financial and non-financial numbers can be done through a variety of methods. One method is zero based budgeting which like all methods has strengths and weaknesses. The purpose of this article is to examine the strengths and weaknesses of zero based budgeting. 

To most FP&A professionals and accountants there is confusion and a lack of consensus on how to allocate costs to products and service lines. I refer to this as “a mystery in a box to accountants”. To solve this mystery here are three lectures to accounting students from a skilled and experienced accountant – me – that explains the problem and how to solve it. For those who have already graduated from college and may even have a CPA, I encourage you to sit in the back of the lecture hall and audit these classes.