Skip to main content
Home
The Online Resource for Modern FP&A Professionals
Please register to receive the latest FP&A news, updates and tips Login

Main menu

  • Home
  • FP&A Insights
    • FP&A Trends Digest
    • FP&A Trends Research
    • FP&A Trends Insight Paper
    • FP&A Trends Survey
    • Short Videos
    • Our Contributors
  • FP&A Events
    • International FP&A Board
    • FP&A Trends Webinars
    • Digital FP&A Circles
  • AI/ML Committee
    • Introduction
    • Members
    • Resources
    • Meetings
  • FP&A Tools
    • FP&A Trends Maturity Model
  • About Us
    • Company Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Editorial Guidelines
    • Our Ambassadors
    • Our Sponsors & Partners
    • Contact Us
image
Evaluating Business Cases in a Marketplaces Environment
January 27, 2022

By Matt Armstrong, Founder & CEO at Prevoira

FP&A Tags
Data-Driven FP&A
FP&A Case Studies
Profitability Analysis
Financial Planning and Analysis

fp&aIntroduction

Providing decision support on product offerings in an online marketplaces environment requires digging deep on the granularity of the key business drivers to evaluate success. Using a method called “A/B testing” allows an FP&A leader to easily build a framework on key criteria to better understand the various behavioural impacts that consumers apply in different scenarios and to analyse their performance.  In this note, a holistic decision framework is applied to an online marketplace using A/B testing to evaluate whether to develop a Buy-Now-Pay-later (BNPL) offering in house or to work with a vendor to supply it.

What is BNPL?

BNPL is a mechanism for consumers to purchase a good or service without fully paying for it upfront.  Another term for this plan is "instalment payments", which are extremely popular in countries like Brasil where the average consumer does not have the same level of disposable income as countries such as the United States or the United Kingdom.  Think of it as making a purchase with your credit card, and paying it off later, but there is no interest applied. One example of a BNPL offering is that you want to buy a $10 avocado slicer but pay only $5 now, and then commit to paying the other $5 at some later date, either in one shot 30 days from now, or paying $1 each for the next 5 months, etc… This is a great option for the consumer as it provides flexibility but there is the risk to the merchant in terms of understanding the creditworthiness of the consumer and potential for default.
 
At Wish, we wanted to evaluate the benefits of offering BNPL to our consumers. However, we wanted to determine if the BNPL offering should be managed in-house or if it should be managed by a vendor on our behalf. The criteria for BNPL loans that we want to provide for the consumer is to pay for 50% of the product immediately, and then pay the remaining 50% of the product in 30 days.

A/B Testing

The beauty of an online marketplace is that there are tools available to segment consumers to what they see on the site into multiple groups, which is what we call "A/B testing": where one group of consumers sees a form of an offering and another group sees a slightly different form, all the while ensuring that there is enough randomisation between the two groups to eliminate selection bias between the two sets of users. The test is then run over a pre-determined period such that the samples from the test become statistically significant and key metrics are compared to better understand business performance.

Analysing the product offering

From a holistic perspective in a B2C environment, it is important not only to understand the financial impacts of a business initiative but also the consumer's behavioural impacts from the initiative.  Specifically, in comparing the in-house (A) to the vendor-based (B) offering for BNPL, we want to answer the following questions:

  • How much do consumers buy with the BNPL offering in (A) vs. (B) groups?

  • i.e. what is the loan penetration (% of people purchasing with BNPL), average item value, basket size (number of items per transaction), purchase frequency (transactions purchased in a period), etc…

  • And what is the performance of these offerings in different countries?

  • i.e., Brazilian consumers have instalment payments (a form of BNPL) ingrained in their culture, but not the Swiss – so would they even want the offering?

  • What is the cancellation and refunds performance like?

  • i.e., do users cancel more or ask for more refunds in (A) vs. (B)?  Specifically, are users more committed in one offering vs. another?

  • Since the vendor will charge a risk premium to manage default rates in the form of fees, will the premium in (B) offset the default rates assumed in (A)?  

  • Are there multiple fees in (A) vs. (B)?  How do these costs impact the gross margin?

These questions not only help flush out the key business drivers that impact user behaviour but can also be translated into financial results.

Evaluating the results

A framework to answer these questions is to first develop a P&L for each of the A and B groups, and then to create subsegments for those that took out BNPL loans vs. those that did not in each of the A and B groups. Essentially, you’re creating four different P&Ls for each of these subgroups which clearly identify the drivers at the right level of granularity. This helps identify not only the financial performance but also the behavioural drivers which might impact the product design in each of the A and B groups.  For example, did the loan penetration rate identify more friction to sign up for a loan in either A or B contributing to volume differences in one group vs. another?  And were the subsegments of the non-loan purchasers consistent in each of the A and B groups?

This method of P&L evaluation down to EBITDA will help determine if the short-term P&L impacts are more beneficial in each of the A and B buckets.  To also take a long-term view, you would want to look at consumer retention over time in one bucket vs. another to determine if the repeat rate for the customers would increase in the A vs. B bucket, which could then be incorporated into the overall analysis.

And finally, there are operational considerations and costs to the program that may not be immediately obvious on the P&L: Is this a core competency to invest in-house where operational processes for collection need to be maintained and managed? What is the overhead to manage the regulatory landscape for providing such an offering in the countries that the company does business in?  These are non-trivial questions that need to be addressed as part of the overall BNPL solution as well.

Summarising the process

An "A/B test" framework is a great method to evaluate whether a product offering should be made available in an online marketplaces environment.  Key criteria for the FP&A professional should always be to segment to the most appropriate level of granularity in subgroups for the A and B buckets on both operational and financial metrics in the evaluation. However, the FP&A professional should also not forget the operational and risk considerations to derive at a recommendation.
 

The full text is available for registered users. Please register to view the rest of the article.
  • Log In
  • or
  • Register

Related articles

fp&a
3 Ways FP&A Can Break Down P&Ls for Better Insights
August 12, 2021

One of the most important aspects of the FP&A role is to be able to provide...

Read more
revenue
Challenges in Revenue Management - 5 Ways to Maximise Net Sales
August 19, 2021

Maintaining or increasing profit margins is key to the development of a company, but in many...

Read more
Creating Value
P&L Management: from Bean Counting to Creating Value
October 14, 2020

This series of articles focuses on blowing up this stereotype by demonstrating how Finance in general...

Read more
fp&a
6 Tips for an Efficient Business Performance Measurement Process
September 2, 2021

Many companies measure their progress against annual objectives through profit and loss (P&L) reporting and a...

Read more
+

Subscribe to
FP&A Trends Digest

We will regularly update you on the latest trends and developments in FP&A. Take the opportunity to have articles written by finance thought leaders delivered directly to your inbox; watch compelling webinars; connect with like-minded professionals; and become a part of our global community.

Create new account

image

Event Calendar

Pagination

  • Previous
  • May 2025
  • Next
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27
28
29
30
1
2
3
 
 
 
 
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Transforming FP&A Together: Human & AI Synergy
 
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Moving from FP&A to Extended Planning and Analysis (xP&A)
 
Five Critical Roles for Building a World-Class FP&A Team
 
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
FP&A Business Partnering and AI: A New Era
 
All events for the year

Future Meetings

The Face-to-Face Amsterdam FP&A Board
The Face-to-Face Amsterdam FP&A Board Transforming FP&A Together: Human & AI Synergy

May 15, 2025

The Face-to-Face Milan FP&A Board
The Face-to-Face Milan FP&A Board Moving from FP&A to Extended Planning and Analysis (xP&A)

May 20, 2025

The Face-to-Face Frankfurt FP&A Board
The Face-to-Face Frankfurt FP&A Board Five Critical Roles for Building a World-Class FP&A Team

May 22, 2025

BPAI
The FP&A Trends Webinar FP&A Business Partnering and AI: A New Era

May 28, 2025

The Face-to-Face London FP&A Board: Data Management & Analytics: Unlocking FP&A Value
The Face-to-Face London FP&A Board Mastering Data in FP&A: Smarter Analytics, Better Decisions

June 5, 2025

FP&A Trends Webinar The Evolving Role of FP&A: From Number Cruncher to Strategic Advisor
The FP&A Trends Webinar Making FP&A Teams Fit for the Future

June 11, 2025

The Face-to-Face New York FP&A Board
The Face-to-Face New York FP&A Board From Insight to Impact: FP&A Business Partnering in Action

June 17, 2025

The Face-to-Face Sydney FP&A Board
The Face-to-Face Sydney FP&A Board Modern Financial Planning and Analysis (FP&A): Latest Trends and Developments

June 26, 2025

The Face-to-Face Singapore FP&A Board: Modern Financial Planning and Analysis (FP&A): Latest Trends and Developments
The Face-to-Face Singapore FP&A Board Modern Financial Planning and Analysis (FP&A): Latest Trends and Developments

July 8, 2025

AI/ML FP&A
AI/ML FP&A
Data and Analytics
Data & Analytics
FP&A Case Studies
FP&A Case Studies
FP&A Research
FP&A Research
General
General
Integrated FP&A
Integrated FP&A
People and Culture
People and Culture
Process
Process
Technology
Technology

Please register to receive the latest FP&A news, updates and tips.

info@fpa-trends.com​

              

Foot menu

  • FP&A Insights
  • FP&A Board
  • FP&A Videos

Footer countries

  • Amsterdam
  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Brisbane
  • Brussels
  • Chicago
  • Copenhagen
  • Dubai
  • Frankfurt
  • Geneva
  • Helsinki
  • Hong Kong
  • Houston
  • Kuala Lumpur
  • London Board
  • London (Circle)
  • Melbourne
  • Miami
  • Milan
  • Munich
  • New York
  • Paris
  • Perth
  • Riyadh
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Singapore
  • Stockholm
  • Sydney
  • Tokyo
  • Toronto
  • Washington D.C.
  • Zurich

Copyright © 2025 fpa-trends.com. All rights reserved.

0