Skip to main content
Home
The Online Resource for Modern FP&A Professionals
Please register to receive the latest FP&A news, updates and tips Login

Main menu

  • Home
  • FP&A Insights
    • FP&A Trends Digest
    • FP&A Trends Research
    • FP&A Trends Insight Paper
    • FP&A Trends Survey
    • Short Videos
    • Our Contributors
  • FP&A Events
    • International FP&A Board
    • FP&A Trends Webinars
    • Digital FP&A Circles
  • AI/ML Committee
    • Introduction
    • Members
    • Resources
    • Meetings
  • FP&A Tools
    • FP&A Trends Maturity Model
  • About Us
    • Company Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Editorial Guidelines
    • Our Ambassadors
    • Our Sponsors & Partners
    • Contact Us
image
Budgeting and Forecasting Myths
February 18, 2020

By Carl Seidman, Principal at Seidman Financial

FP&A Tags
Financial Planning and Analysis
Planning and Budgeting
Modelling and Forecasting

Most sizable companies around the world engage in some form of forecasting.  Forecasting of sales, production, inventory, cash, and financial statements may be among those activities companies seek to track. However, most companies subscribe to outdated thinking and practices when it comes to forecasting. This article will address some of the traditional practices that were once true but now border on myth. This includes the importance of budgeting, the time required to build a rolling forecast, the importance of always-improving accuracy, and the relevance of traditional spreadsheet software.
 
A core aspect of financial planning & analysis (FP&A) is forecasting and budgeting.  To plan effectively and envision the future, businesses must contemplate company-specific, competitive, and macro considerations.  The better the intelligence, arguably, the better the forecast and budget.  However, many businesses attempt to drive their businesses forward based upon flawed assumptions that waste time and capital.  Effective financial planning requires a practical approach to forecasting and budgeting, implementing approaches that make sense rather than reinforce outdated norms.
 
In this article, exposed are some of the more common myths so frequently accepted as truth within FP&A groups around the globe.

 

Myth 1

Myth: The aim of a forecast is to be as accurate as possible.  
Truth:  The aim of a forecast is to be as accurate as needed to effect business decisions with a heightened level of confidence.  Many forecasters believe they should aspire to continuously minimize variances between forecast figures and actuals.  Certainly, this would indicate that forecast accuracy is high.  However, the degree of resource commitment, diligence, and reforecasting needed to reach extremely high forecast accuracy is often unrealistic.  
Think about what is the purpose and use of a forecast.  Oftentimes, business decisions can move forward with a high level of confidence without needing to be categorically accurate.  

Myth 2

Myth: Budgets are necessary for running a business.  
Truth:  Budgets can be helpful for running a business but aren’t essential.  The budget is a tool that has been used by companies around the globe, small and large, for decades.  They’re used to translate strategic plans into financial plans, deploy resources, and compensate professionals for hitting future targets.  Although it’s hard to argue against these benefits, the issue many companies encounter is the inaccuracy of budgets once the fiscal year begins.  In a matter of just a few short months, budgeted figures can become completely out-of-date and impractical for planning purposes.  A new phase in the evolution of FP&A is arising where companies seek to maintain an up-to-date forecast that reflects the most current company-specific and macroeconomic intelligence.  These live financial models can serve the company well, allowing decisions to be made in real-time based upon current information.

Myth 3

Myth:  Budgets should be used to set targets upon which compensation is based.
Truth:  Many company departments are all too familiar with the unfair consequences of breaking and beating the budget. On one hand, when a department breaks the budget, financial performance falls below target and the department is often shamed for the disappointment.  On the contrary, when a department beats the budget, it’s often not reasonably rewarded for the success; instead, the savings are frequently reallocated to other groups.  As a result, many departments find themselves between a rock and a hard place.  In order to hedge these outcomes, many professionals find themselves intentionally sandbagging their numbers, ensuring they’ve baked enough fat into the budget so that they can more comfortably hit their numbers as they need.
 
Just as earnings expectations influence the executive office’s performance motivations, so do budgeted targets influence professionals’ daily behavior.  If budgets are how compensation is guided, professionals are more likely to bake in bias to increase the likelihood of hitting targets.  Of course, not all professionals are motivated by compensation but it tends to be a dominant factor.  If compensation is tied to the budget, the budget is likely to be biased.  Instead, companies should segment variable compensation into various categories, each of which is tied to different types of performance.  For example, a company may tie part of an individual’s variable compensation to the company’s overall performance, tie part to departmental performance, and tie part to individual performance.  Note that the key factor here is performance, not an achievement of a pre-determined target as is the case with most budgeting.

 

Conclusions

In summary, FP&A should be tasked with helping companies make better business decisions. Companies should encourage FP&A to drive the business from the numbers, rather than set arbitrary budgetary targets and superficially back into them.  To minimize or even eliminate sandbagging, it’s imperative to do away with outdated practices that disincentivize people from doing the right thing. Leadership has the unique capacity to spearhead common-sense approaches to building an excellent financial culture – a culture that behaves in-line with facts, not myths.

The article was first published in Unit4 Prevero Blog

The full text is available for registered users. Please register to view the rest of the article.
  • Log In
  • or
  • Register

Related articles

Corporate Finance Budgeting: Bridging Past and Future
May 14, 2017

Many sophisticated business environments use budgets as a bridge between actual and forecast. Within the corporate...

Read more
Budgeting: The Game Is Up
November 8, 2019

Budgeting no longer helps organisations to perform better. On the contrary. It prevents organisations from performing...

Read more
Five Steps to Set Stretch Targets for Your Budgeting Process
July 25, 2018

A few days ago, I was looking through some blogs on LinkedIn when I came across...

Read more
+

Subscribe to
FP&A Trends Digest

We will regularly update you on the latest trends and developments in FP&A. Take the opportunity to have articles written by finance thought leaders delivered directly to your inbox; watch compelling webinars; connect with like-minded professionals; and become a part of our global community.

Create new account

image

Event Calendar

Pagination

  • Previous
  • May 2025
  • Next
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27
28
29
30
1
2
3
 
 
 
 
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Transforming FP&A Together: Human & AI Synergy
 
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Moving from FP&A to Extended Planning and Analysis (xP&A)
 
Five Critical Roles for Building a World-Class FP&A Team
 
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
FP&A Business Partnering and AI: A New Era
 
All events for the year

Future Meetings

The Face-to-Face Amsterdam FP&A Board
The Face-to-Face Amsterdam FP&A Board Transforming FP&A Together: Human & AI Synergy

May 15, 2025

The Face-to-Face Milan FP&A Board
The Face-to-Face Milan FP&A Board Moving from FP&A to Extended Planning and Analysis (xP&A)

May 20, 2025

The Face-to-Face Frankfurt FP&A Board
The Face-to-Face Frankfurt FP&A Board Five Critical Roles for Building a World-Class FP&A Team

May 22, 2025

BPAI
The FP&A Trends Webinar FP&A Business Partnering and AI: A New Era

May 28, 2025

The Face-to-Face London FP&A Board: Data Management & Analytics: Unlocking FP&A Value
The Face-to-Face London FP&A Board Mastering Data in FP&A: Smarter Analytics, Better Decisions

June 5, 2025

FP&A Trends Webinar The Evolving Role of FP&A: From Number Cruncher to Strategic Advisor
The FP&A Trends Webinar Making FP&A Teams Fit for the Future

June 11, 2025

The Face-to-Face New York FP&A Board
The Face-to-Face New York FP&A Board From Insight to Impact: FP&A Business Partnering in Action

June 17, 2025

The Face-to-Face Sydney FP&A Board
The Face-to-Face Sydney FP&A Board Modern Financial Planning and Analysis (FP&A): Latest Trends and Developments

June 26, 2025

The Face-to-Face Singapore FP&A Board: Modern Financial Planning and Analysis (FP&A): Latest Trends and Developments
The Face-to-Face Singapore FP&A Board Modern Financial Planning and Analysis (FP&A): Latest Trends and Developments

July 8, 2025

AI/ML FP&A
AI/ML FP&A
Data and Analytics
Data & Analytics
FP&A Case Studies
FP&A Case Studies
FP&A Research
FP&A Research
General
General
Integrated FP&A
Integrated FP&A
People and Culture
People and Culture
Process
Process
Technology
Technology

Please register to receive the latest FP&A news, updates and tips.

info@fpa-trends.com​

              

Foot menu

  • FP&A Insights
  • FP&A Board
  • FP&A Videos

Footer countries

  • Amsterdam
  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Brisbane
  • Brussels
  • Chicago
  • Copenhagen
  • Dubai
  • Frankfurt
  • Geneva
  • Helsinki
  • Hong Kong
  • Houston
  • Kuala Lumpur
  • London Board
  • London (Circle)
  • Melbourne
  • Miami
  • Milan
  • Munich
  • New York
  • Paris
  • Perth
  • Riyadh
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Singapore
  • Stockholm
  • Sydney
  • Tokyo
  • Toronto
  • Washington D.C.
  • Zurich

Copyright © 2025 fpa-trends.com. All rights reserved.

0