Skip to main content
Home
The Online Resource for Modern FP&A Professionals
Please register to receive the latest FP&A news, updates and tips Login

Main menu

  • Home
  • FP&A Insights
    • FP&A Trends Digest
    • FP&A Trends Research
    • FP&A Trends Insight Paper
    • FP&A Trends Survey
    • Short Videos
    • Our Contributors
  • FP&A Events
    • International FP&A Board
    • FP&A Trends Webinars
    • Digital FP&A Circles
  • AI/ML Committee
    • Introduction
    • Members
    • Resources
    • Meetings
  • FP&A Tools
    • FP&A Trends Maturity Model
  • About Us
    • Company Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Editorial Guidelines
    • Our Ambassadors
    • Our Sponsors & Partners
    • Contact Us
image
Productivity Management: An Essential Capability For Finance Executives Seeking To Drive Strategy & Business Value
November 26, 2018

By Dean Sorensen, Founder of IBP Collaborative

FP&A Tags
Financial Planning and Analysis

Managing enterprise productivity is an essential capability for value-focused Finance executives.  It provides the basis for superior strategy execution, cost and profitability management, by purging organizations of one of the primary causes of value erosion: functional silos.

The world is filled with articles about the need for Finance functions to be better value drivers.  Ones that shape the definition and execution of strategy, while simultaneously maintaining competitive cost structures that support profitable growth.  

These aspirations underlie a bevy of buzzwords such as Finance Transformation, Finance Business Partnering and Strategic Finance.  Whatever label is applied to these aspirations, finance executives frequently fall short of achieving them.  Especially in global organizations that exhibit the complexity characteristics shown below in Exhibit 1.

Exhibit 1: Complexity Characteristics – As the number of complexity characteristics increase, Finance Functions (and organizations as a whole) are more likely to be affected by complexity-related challenges and functional silos

  • Large Scale: Many products, brands, services, customers, employees, vendors, purchased parts & commodities
  • Variability: In demand volume, product & customer mix, inventory & service levels, product pricing & input costs
  • Rapid Change: To products, suppliers, services, processes, projects, operational constraints, organization structures
  • Organization Structure: Multiple legal entities, Business Units (BUs) , Shared Services and geographies
  • Interdependence: BUs share customers, suppliers, production and back office services, thereby obscuring profit drivers
  • Globalization: Strategies deployed through supply chains that cut across multiple entities

Why is it difficult for finance executives to realize these aspirations?  One reason is the persistence of functional silos.  Not only do they undermine strategy and impede change, they erode value by causing dissatisfied customers, lost revenue and bloated cost structures.

As shown in Exhibit 2, functional silos – not data silos - are one of the top barriers to achieving common business objectives, according to a host of recent research studies.

Exhibit 2: Out of 28 research studies, 27 (or 97%) ranked functional silos as one of the top 3 barriers to achieving key business objectives. Of these 17 (or 61%) identified silos as the top barrier, while 36% ranked it as the 2nd or 3rd greatest barrier

Alignment Paradox

These are classic examples of “horizontally-based” business objectives and initiatives. Others include operational excellence, quality management and six sigma.  What’s common to them is that their underlying value is based on improving cross-functional outcomes, horizontally across functions and entities.

The problem is that organizations don’t plan, manage and govern this way.  Rewards and decision rights typically follow functionally based budgeting and reporting processes.  As a result, these “vertically-based” financial processes can be at odds with “horizontally-based” strategies.  In other words, financial processes are not always aligned with corporate strategies.  This is the “alignment paradox” facing Finance executives in global organizations.

Enterprise Productivity Management

One way of addressing this alignment paradox is with enterprise productivity management – a method for managing how effectively organizations produce key business outcomes, examples of which are provided below:

  • New & retained customers that are ready to buy from us
  • Completed orders that meet customer expectations
  • Positions that are staffed with motivated and capable people
  • Suppliers that are capable of providing quality products when needed
  • Available products that meet customer quality and service level expectations

These examples also illustrate what productivity management is not.  That being a method for managing the efficiency of individual functions, activities and tasks.  It entails a broader perspective that focus on key factors that drive business value.   It has four key benefits, which are illustrated in Exhibit 3, described in detail below and summarized as follows:

  1. Improve transparency by way of a productivity management framework
  2. Drive continuous improvement and cost reduction, with readily available and accurate process cost data
  3. Break down functional silos by managing key tradeoffs that govern enterprise performance
  4. Align employees around value optimization a establishing shared rewards based on managing key tradeoffs

Exhibit 3: Productivity Management Capabilities – Three productivity management capabilities play a central role in helping organizations to more effectively manage functional silos.

 


The first benefit is greater performance transparency.  

One that is rooted in a deeper and shared understanding of the economics of the business.  Productivity metrics can be decomposed from top to bottom using a framework like the one illustrated in Exhibit 3.1. For example, for the “Order to Cash” process, “cost per order” can be decomposed down to “cost per pick”, for high, medium and low volume inventory (or A,B & C) items.  What’s more, these productivity metrics can be managed by product, customer and segment, across legal entities.

The second benefit is that the organizations can more effectively drive continuous improvement and cost reduction.  

This is because they have readily available access to accurate business process and activity costs. This is achieved with a cost matrix (illustrated in Exhibit 3.2) that reconciles functional (i.e. chart of accounts) costs to business process and activity costs – at all times for actuals, budgets and forecasts. Not only can organizations track cost reduction efforts, but they’ll have an ongoing inventory of cost reduction opportunities.

The third benefit relates to breaking down functional silos. 

This is achieved by focusing people on key tradeoffs for all business processes and the activities that comprise them. For example, in an order to cash process (illustrated in Exhibit 3.3), the three “Tradeoff Metrics” are perfect order fulfillment, days in accounts receivable and cost per order. By focusing people on balancing these conflicting measures across functions and entities, organizations can establish a formal mechanism for optimizing business performance.

The fourth benefit pertains to value alignment.

This is achieved by establishing shared rewards for managing tradeoff measures. For example, in order to cash process, tradeoff measures are defined for component activities such as order entry, fulfillment, delivery, invoicing and collection. However, the majority of rewards are based on the ability to achieve the overall tradeoff measures.  As a result, people are motivated to make decisions that optimize performance of business processes and the organization as a whole.

Value and Benefits

From a process perspective, one of the most important benefits of productivity management is that it enables more effective rolling forecast processes.  Without functional silos to obstruct the process, resources can move more freely between functions and entities.  Moreover, the cost and cycle time of these processes can be significantly reduced.

Collectively, these benefits create tangible business value in two ways.  First, by removing one of the primary obstacles to consistent strategy execution: functional silos.  Another is by reducing complexity costs, which can amount to 5% of sale in global organizations.  I wrote about this in a previous FP&A Trends article, which can be accessed here.

These benefits and value make productivity management an essential capability for value-focused Finance executives. Especially in complex organizations where functional silos have undermined operational excellence and other horizontally-driven initiatives.

By embedding productivity management into planning and performance processes, finance executives can play a more prominent role in executing strategies that drive profitable growth and competitive cost structures.  All while making financial functions and processes more cost effective.

 

The full text is available for registered users. Please register to view the rest of the article.
  • Log In
  • or
  • Register

Related articles

Focus On Value Drivers!
August 14, 2018

The corporate planning process is a controversial subject on which opinions differ widely. But experience has...

Read more
The One Big Value Driver that FP&A’s has Always Known About
September 18, 2018

FP&A teams have been growing in popularity because they have always known about one big thing...

Read more
FP&A Value Cycle – Data Leadership Strategy
May 11, 2017

The Value Cycle is our approach at redefining FP&A’s role in the organization. To take a...

Read more
Driver-Based Planning Maturity: Creating Value With More Effective Rolling Forecasts
December 4, 2018

Mature driver-based planning models are an essential component of effective rolling forecast processes in complex, global...

Read more
Integrated FP&A: How to Close Complexity Gaps
May 2, 2018

The cost of complexity can be significant – upwards of 5% of sales in global organizations. Forward-thinking...

Read more
What’s The Difference Between Integrated Business Planning and Integrated Financial Planning?
March 28, 2019

Integrated Financial Planning (IFP) and Integrated Business Planning (IBP) mean different things to different people. Primarily because...

Read more
+

Subscribe to
FP&A Trends Digest

We will regularly update you on the latest trends and developments in FP&A. Take the opportunity to have articles written by finance thought leaders delivered directly to your inbox; watch compelling webinars; connect with like-minded professionals; and become a part of our global community.

Create new account

image

Event Calendar

Pagination

  • Previous
  • May 2025
  • Next
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27
28
29
30
1
2
3
 
 
 
 
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Transforming FP&A Together: Human & AI Synergy
 
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Moving from FP&A to Extended Planning and Analysis (xP&A)
 
Five Critical Roles for Building a World-Class FP&A Team
 
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
FP&A Business Partnering and AI: A New Era
 
All events for the year

Future Meetings

The Face-to-Face Amsterdam FP&A Board
The Face-to-Face Amsterdam FP&A Board Transforming FP&A Together: Human & AI Synergy

May 15, 2025

The Face-to-Face Milan FP&A Board
The Face-to-Face Milan FP&A Board Moving from FP&A to Extended Planning and Analysis (xP&A)

May 20, 2025

The Face-to-Face Frankfurt FP&A Board
The Face-to-Face Frankfurt FP&A Board Five Critical Roles for Building a World-Class FP&A Team

May 22, 2025

BPAI
The FP&A Trends Webinar FP&A Business Partnering and AI: A New Era

May 28, 2025

The Face-to-Face London FP&A Board: Data Management & Analytics: Unlocking FP&A Value
The Face-to-Face London FP&A Board Mastering Data in FP&A: Smarter Analytics, Better Decisions

June 5, 2025

FP&A Trends Webinar The Evolving Role of FP&A: From Number Cruncher to Strategic Advisor
The FP&A Trends Webinar Making FP&A Teams Fit for the Future

June 11, 2025

The Face-to-Face New York FP&A Board
The Face-to-Face New York FP&A Board From Insight to Impact: FP&A Business Partnering in Action

June 17, 2025

The Face-to-Face Sydney FP&A Board
The Face-to-Face Sydney FP&A Board Modern Financial Planning and Analysis (FP&A): Latest Trends and Developments

June 26, 2025

The Face-to-Face Singapore FP&A Board: Modern Financial Planning and Analysis (FP&A): Latest Trends and Developments
The Face-to-Face Singapore FP&A Board Modern Financial Planning and Analysis (FP&A): Latest Trends and Developments

July 8, 2025

AI/ML FP&A
AI/ML FP&A
Data and Analytics
Data & Analytics
FP&A Case Studies
FP&A Case Studies
FP&A Research
FP&A Research
General
General
Integrated FP&A
Integrated FP&A
People and Culture
People and Culture
Process
Process
Technology
Technology

Please register to receive the latest FP&A news, updates and tips.

info@fpa-trends.com​

              

Foot menu

  • FP&A Insights
  • FP&A Board
  • FP&A Videos

Footer countries

  • Amsterdam
  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Brisbane
  • Brussels
  • Chicago
  • Copenhagen
  • Dubai
  • Frankfurt
  • Geneva
  • Helsinki
  • Hong Kong
  • Houston
  • Kuala Lumpur
  • London Board
  • London (Circle)
  • Melbourne
  • Miami
  • Milan
  • Munich
  • New York
  • Paris
  • Perth
  • Riyadh
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Singapore
  • Stockholm
  • Sydney
  • Tokyo
  • Toronto
  • Washington D.C.
  • Zurich

Copyright © 2025 fpa-trends.com. All rights reserved.

0