SWTCH by Pigment
Three days of predictions, insights, and advice from leaders in finance, sales, HR, supply chain and more
Register now here
SWTCH by Pigment
Three days of predictions, insights, and advice from leaders in finance, sales, HR, supply chain and more
Register now here
By Michael Coveney, Analytics Thought Leader and Author
A number of years ago I was contacted by a manager in the Health profession and asked if I could tell them 25 measures they should be tracking. I was a little surprised and thought to myself that if they didn’t know what those measures were given that they worked in the industry, then what chance would I have in coming up with the right ones.
In reply I asked them what was the purpose of the organization, as in my opinion, the measures ought to be associated with what they were trying to achieve. But this didn’t help. They were looking out for a list that they could then track and presumably say that they were now adequately measuring performance.
Measures, like actions, cannot be just ‘plucked’ out of the air. Measures are the vital signs of any organization and so it is important that you track the right ones. There’s no point going into a hospital and they start to measure the length of your hair when you’re suffering from a broken leg. Of course, there are a number of vital signs that need to be monitored such as heartbeat, blood pressure and so on, in the same way that organizations need to monitor things like cash flow, headcount, etc. But these ‘vital sign’ measures do not tell you about what led up to the issue or what the organization needs to do, to put things right. It is in these areas where many organizations fail to measure the right things.
In any performance management system, there will be many measurement types that fall into the following eight groups:
Of course, some measures will appear in multiple groups but the point about the groupings is to ensure that they cover all aspects of performance. For each measure, there will need to be versions to capture target values, forecast values, and actual performance.
By identifying measures in this way it is also possible to generate interesting reports that show, for example – where we stand on the assumptions made; where initiative deadlines have or look likely to be missed; and how close to success are we.
All measures have a cost in acquiring them, be that through data transfer, manual input or in creating a specific sub-system to hold them. Some may be easy and relatively straightforward to get hold of, for example, those coming from a general ledger. Others may not exist or be ‘expensive’ in terms of manual effort or the investment in systems required to get hold of them.
For every measure identified, its source and the ‘cost’ of getting hold of it will need to be assessed. If the cost outweighs the value that the measure brings to an organization, then it should be dropped or an alternative found.
Measures that are valuable but require investment in an IT system should have their implementation prioritized. As well as noting the source of any measure, the frequency of availability and its reliability (i.e. accuracy) should also be assessed. Also, note down any extract routines, transformations or manual data entry screens that will be required.
In summary, don’t just choose any old measure because it’s available or use a measure because someone else is using it. Instead, choose measures because of the value it brings to the management of performance
We will regularly update you on the latest trends and developments in FP&A. Take the opportunity to have articles written by finance thought leaders delivered directly to your inbox; watch compelling webinars; connect with like-minded professionals; and become a part of our global community.